|
|
The purpose of this paper is to present the motivations for coproduction, identify associated tensions and costs, and identify where coproduction appears warranted. Why coproduce? There are four main arguments for coproduction in the literature: Substantive: where engagement is undertaken to improve the quality of the research . This may be through helping researchers and policy-makers develop a more holistic understanding of a context, an issue and/or a solution , , both epistemologically and ontologically , . The mechanisms by which research quality may improve are not always articulated, but many commentators agree that engagement makes research more relevant by focusing on appropriate topics which need elucidating .
And that by talking with others, we discover ‘unknown unknowns’ and create new kn Guangdong Mobile Number List owledge together. Instrumental: these arguments are based on “a desire to see research findings utilized in effective ways”. Many commentators claim that co-designed and coproduced research is likely to be more impactful , , , . The actual process of collaborative research can help identify practice-based research questions and outcomes that are related to the implementation setting . This includes practical mechanisms such as upskilling and creating capacity amongst non-academics , and creating a sense of trust and empowerment amongst potential users, thus increasing the likelihood of research utilisation and of evidence sharing .
Innovative research designs and feasible ways to collect data can be identified through collaboration . Further, stakeholders can describe how receptive the practice or policy setting is for subsequent implementation of the research findings .This set of arguments connects to the discourse of the civic or public university/academic, focusing on accountability to public funders, and the conduct of research to serve public interests. Second, authors argue that sharing expertise in its guise as power is simply a way to be fairer and more ethical , . Flinders characterises this view as the belief that coproduction can be “transformative not solely in research terms but in social terms: the engagement of citizens and social groups nourishes the renewal of democracy.
|
|
發表於 15:32:34